What Recruiting Bitches Deserve

Recently, there was a post on Fleshbot about "gay-for-pay" porn actor Pat Bateman/Matt Murdock. It expressed anger over how he was doing his bottom (bonafide dumb ass, Marc Stone) doggy-style and using the bottom's back as a table so he could watch a girlie mag while fucking him.

In response to that, I posted this comment:

I think that to all media, producers and viewers who are dumb enough to be recruiters by making the whole gay-for-pay scenario seem like good entertainment, this is exactly the kind of behavior you deserve. Having this rubbed in their faces with such humiliation. I'm glad to see it.

If viewers make enough noise about their anger towards this as they have here, maybe these producers will hire some gay or bi MEN. I emphasize MEN, because a real man is secure enough to admit that he is gay or bi, instead of the bullshit "I'm straight, but I find gay sex fun, too."If these guys find gay sex fun as well, then they should stop being wimpy bitches and admit to being bi.

As I've thought it over, viewers shouldn't be making noise over the fact of how his simply doing it for the money was put so blatantly in their faces. They should be making noise over how the "GAY-FOR-PAY" GENRE SHOULDN'T EXIST AT ALL. This genre is a clear display of self-loathing and hetero-phobia.

Self-loathing because it's the whole "misery loves company" psychology. These producers, directors, viewers, and forms of media who support the "gay-for-pay" genre are using a beautiful thing like sex as a way to make a man who professes himself as straight to "walk a mile in a gay man's shoes" shall we say. When in all actuality, all anyone regardless of their sexual orientation needs to understand a gay man's plight is to be humane enough to not revel in seeing someone oppressed for any unjustified reason, such as the sexual going-ons between consenting adults. But the gay males (far from being men) who feed this "gay-for-pay" machine are so weak in taking their stand that they hate their lives, trying to make a so-called "straight guy" do what they do is their revenge. When in turn, all it does is further displays self-loathing amongst gays that right-wing politicians can use to plead their case of how gays are "diseased in the head", and further allows the so-called "straight guy" to deny his homo- or bisexuality.

Hetero-phobia because it's a clear sign of how these producers, directors, viewers, and media supporters don't live by the principle of "live and let live", which is the same principle they claim to want straight right-wingers to do for them. We are supposed to all be adults here, and it's a damn shame that I must remind you of how 2 wrongs don't make a right. Making a self-professed straight man have sex with another man by throwing big numbers of dollars in his face is wrong. I have always given credit to Jake Cruise for his website, "Straight Guys For Gay Eyes". It is a website for those gay men who are secure enough with their homosexuality that they don't need to see a self-professed straight man have sex with a guy. The gay male viwers of this site are man enough to use their imagination as to what it would be like to have sex with that man IF he was willing to pound male ass the way he does that pussy.

And Yes, I said the P-word. Pussy! Pussy! Pussy! Pussy! Pussy! Now, stop being punk bitches and being afraid of it. After all, you came out of one, so if it wasn't for the beauty of pussy, you wouldn't be here.

Maybe that's what the "gay-for-pay" supporters problem is - ENVY. Envy over how they can't naturally pro-create. WELL GET THE FUCK OVER IT. It's one of the cons you signed up for when you decided to be true to your homosexuality. Now, man-up and deal with it as I do.

What astounds me most about this is how it is a clear sign of how when people are doing something insulting to others, they always tell on themselves. That's what this director at Falcon's Str8Men.com was doing here. He told on himself as to how he lacks respect for a straight man by not letting him really be a straight man and have sex with a woman, and admire the beauty of his manhood that way. Instead, he took away the beauty of whatever manhood Pat Bateman had. And Pat Bateman/Matt Murdock and Marc Stone were both dumb enough to let him.

So while Pat Bateman is an ass for agreeing to be a "gay-for-pay" porn actor in the 1st place, many people's anger in this situation is misplaced. It belongs directed towards the producers and directors of not just Str8Men.com, but all sites and video companies that cater to this genre. And get angry at yourself as well, if you're enough of a trifling dumb-shit to support it. This is the gay porn genre that incites gay-bashing. Think about it. Any man walking into a porno shop sees the posters of both straight and gay porn, whether that straight man wants to admit it or not, he catches a glimpse of that poster for a video by company specializing in "gay-for-pay". What impression does that give him of gay men, if a big advertisement for the "gay-for-pay" genre is held as such a big attraction for gay men?

It says, "Gay men live to recruit."

And in return the straight guy may say, "Not me."

So the slightest gesture from a gay man no matter how nonthreatening can incite violence in that straight man to protect his personal space, because that ad made this straight man feel that gays want to intrude upon his sexual nature. And one's sexual nature is something that should be held sacred in every human being.

Damnit, do unto others as you want done to you.

LIVE AND LET LIVE!